GILBERTSONInvestigations Inc. (239) 571-1840
Self-Defense · Deadly & Non-Deadly Force

Deadly &
Non-Deadly Force

$42M
Plaintiff settlements & judgmentsSecured by retaining counsel in matters since 2014 · See the case file

Direct line: (239) 571-1840  ·  GregoryGilbertson@proton.me

Attorney and law-firm inquiries only

Proportionality is the spine of every self-defense case: what level of force the threat justified, and what level answered it. The analysis explains that match, or mismatch, in language a jury can carry into deliberation.

From the Bench
U.S. District Court Western District of Washington

Never excluded. Professor Gilbertson’s testimony has not been excluded at trial in any state or federal court.

Ruling on a motion to exclude his testimony in Alvarez v. King County, No. C16-0721RAJ, 2017 WL 3189025 (W.D. Wash. July 27, 2017), Judge Richard A. Jones entered the following opinion.

“Mr. Gilbertson’s qualifications demonstrate extensive experience in policing. His expansive work as a police officer in Georgia, with assignments as a SWAT team officer, juvenile court investigator, school resource officer, stakeout squad officer, senior patrolman, and patrolman; then a career as a tenured college professor and university lecturer teaching criminal justice courses to degree-seeking students at colleges and universities, and as a licensed private investigator conducting felony pretrial investigations for attorneys in Washington State in dozens of criminal cases, makes him unique in the field of police expert witnesses. The Court finds that, based on his experience, Mr. Gilbertson’s testimony can be expected to have a reliable basis in knowledge and experience of police practices.”

The Hon. Richard A. Jones United States District Judge
The Scope

What this covers.

Within this engagement

  • Deadly-force self-defense
  • Non-deadly-force self-defense
  • Murder, manslaughter, assault and battery cases
  • Firearm and weapons cases
  • Proportionality and necessity of force
How it is analyzed

The confrontation as the statements, video and scene records show it, with the threat and the response laid side by side against the reasonable-belief standard.

Engagement terms and the published fee schedule: For Retaining Counsel →

“He explained use of force and self-defense in a manner the jury easily understood. His testimony was an integral factor in achieving a not guilty verdict.”
Michael A. Blanchard, Attorney at Law · New London, CT
Questions

Before the record is sent.

What case types use this analysis?
Murder and attempted-murder cases involving self-defense, manslaughter, assault and battery, and firearm or weapons cases, criminal and civil.
What does retention cost?
A non-refundable $9,000 flat fee covering discovery review and the written expert report, with a bullet-point outline approved with counsel before writing begins. The full published schedule is on the For Counsel page.
Retain

Send the force record.

Attorney and law-firm inquiries only. Conflicts are checked before anything substantive, and you will hear about a conflict immediately.

Deadly & non-deadly force inquiry

For counsel examining the level of force used.

Inquiry sent.

You will hear back directly. If the matter is urgent, call (239) 571-1840.

(239) 571-1840Direct line, Naples, Florida GregoryGilbertson@proton.meDirect email, prefilled for this matter.
Nationwide practiceRetained in 42 states and D.C. · Based in Naples, FL

Conflicts are checked before any substantive discussion. Please do not send privileged material with a first inquiry; after retention the record is exchanged on physical media. Gregory consults for attorneys and their staff only, and does not provide legal advice or attorney referrals to individuals.

Back to Self-Defense