Deadly &
Non-Deadly Force
Direct line: (239) 571-1840 · GregoryGilbertson@proton.me
Attorney and law-firm inquiries only
Proportionality is the spine of every self-defense case: what level of force the threat justified, and what level answered it. The analysis explains that match, or mismatch, in language a jury can carry into deliberation.
What this covers.
Within this engagement
- Deadly-force self-defense
- Non-deadly-force self-defense
- Murder, manslaughter, assault and battery cases
- Firearm and weapons cases
- Proportionality and necessity of force
The confrontation reconstructed from statements, video and scene records, with the threat and the response laid side by side against the reasonable-belief standard.
Engagement terms and the published fee schedule: For Retaining Counsel →
Working references for this practice area.
Guides for retaining counsel, written from the same record this analysis reads.
“He explained use of force and self-defense in a manner the jury easily understood. His testimony was an integral factor in achieving a not guilty verdict.”Michael A. Blanchard, Attorney at Law · New London, CT
Before the record is sent.
What case types use this analysis?
What does retention cost?
Send the force record.
Attorney and law-firm inquiries only. Conflicts are checked before anything substantive, and you will hear about a conflict immediately.
Inquiry sent.
You will hear back directly. If the matter is urgent, call (239) 571-1840.
Conflicts are checked before any substantive discussion. Please do not send privileged material with a first inquiry; after retention the record is exchanged on physical media. Gregory consults for attorneys and their staff only, and does not provide legal advice or attorney referrals to individuals.

