GILBERTSONInvestigations Inc. (239) 571-1840
Deficient Investigations · Wrongful-Conviction Review

Wrongful-Conviction
Review

$42M
Plaintiff settlements & judgmentsSecured by retaining counsel in matters since 2014 · See the case file

Direct line: (239) 571-1840  ·  GregoryGilbertson@proton.me

Attorney and law-firm inquiries only

Years later, the file still holds what the first investigation would not see: the alternative suspect never run down, the exculpatory lead never preserved, the theory that hardened before the evidence was in. Post-conviction review reads the file without the tunnel.

From the Bench
U.S. District Court Western District of Washington

Never excluded. Professor Gilbertson’s testimony has not been excluded at trial in any state or federal court.

Ruling on a motion to exclude his testimony in Alvarez v. King County, No. C16-0721RAJ, 2017 WL 3189025 (W.D. Wash. July 27, 2017), Judge Richard A. Jones entered the following opinion.

“Mr. Gilbertson’s qualifications demonstrate extensive experience in policing. His expansive work as a police officer in Georgia, with assignments as a SWAT team officer, juvenile court investigator, school resource officer, stakeout squad officer, senior patrolman, and patrolman; then a career as a tenured college professor and university lecturer teaching criminal justice courses to degree-seeking students at colleges and universities, and as a licensed private investigator conducting felony pretrial investigations for attorneys in Washington State in dozens of criminal cases, makes him unique in the field of police expert witnesses. The Court finds that, based on his experience, Mr. Gilbertson’s testimony can be expected to have a reliable basis in knowledge and experience of police practices.”

The Hon. Richard A. Jones United States District Judge
The Scope

What this covers.

Within this engagement

  • Wrongful-conviction and post-conviction case review
  • Investigative bias and tunnel vision
  • Failure to consider alternative suspects
  • Failure to preserve exculpatory evidence
  • Homicide and serious-felony investigation review
How it is analyzed

The full original investigative file, re-examined against standardized homicide and serious-felony procedure: what was collected, what was ignored, which leads died, and whether the documented procedure supports the conviction narrative.

Engagement terms and the published fee schedule: For Retaining Counsel →

Questions

Before the record is sent.

Who retains post-conviction review?
Post-conviction and appellate counsel, innocence organizations, and criminal defense attorneys evaluating whether the original investigation followed the procedures the record claims.
What does retention cost?
A non-refundable $9,000 flat fee covering discovery review and the written expert report, with a bullet-point outline approved with counsel before writing begins. The full published schedule is on the For Counsel page.
Retain

Send the conviction record.

Attorney and law-firm inquiries only. Conflicts are checked before anything substantive, and you will hear about a conflict immediately.

Wrongful-conviction review inquiry

For post-conviction and civil counsel reviewing the original work.

Inquiry sent.

You will hear back directly. If the matter is urgent, call (239) 571-1840.

(239) 571-1840Direct line, Naples, Florida GregoryGilbertson@proton.meDirect email, prefilled for this matter.
Nationwide practiceRetained in 42 states and D.C. · Based in Naples, FL

Conflicts are checked before any substantive discussion. Please do not send privileged material with a first inquiry; after retention the record is exchanged on physical media. Gregory consults for attorneys and their staff only, and does not provide legal advice or attorney referrals to individuals.

Back to Deficient Investigations