GILBERTSONInvestigations Inc. (239) 571-1840
Police Misconduct · Falsified Reports

Reports That Do Not
Match the Record

$42M
Plaintiff settlements & judgmentsSecured by retaining counsel in matters since 2014 · See the case file

Direct line: (239) 571-1840  ·  GregoryGilbertson@proton.me

Attorney and law-firm inquiries only

A police report is supposed to be a record, not a narrative. When statements and paperwork diverge from the video and the timeline, the divergence itself becomes evidence, and it can be documented line by line.

From the Bench
U.S. District Court Western District of Washington

Never excluded. Professor Gilbertson’s testimony has not been excluded at trial in any state or federal court.

Ruling on a motion to exclude his testimony in Alvarez v. King County, No. C16-0721RAJ, 2017 WL 3189025 (W.D. Wash. July 27, 2017), Judge Richard A. Jones entered the following opinion.

“Mr. Gilbertson’s qualifications demonstrate extensive experience in policing. His expansive work as a police officer in Georgia, with assignments as a SWAT team officer, juvenile court investigator, school resource officer, stakeout squad officer, senior patrolman, and patrolman; then a career as a tenured college professor and university lecturer teaching criminal justice courses to degree-seeking students at colleges and universities, and as a licensed private investigator conducting felony pretrial investigations for attorneys in Washington State in dozens of criminal cases, makes him unique in the field of police expert witnesses. The Court finds that, based on his experience, Mr. Gilbertson’s testimony can be expected to have a reliable basis in knowledge and experience of police practices.”

The Hon. Richard A. Jones United States District Judge
The Scope

What this covers.

Within this engagement

  • False or misleading officer statements
  • Embellished and inaccurate police reports
  • Falsified police reports
  • Officer report-writing practices
  • Police misconduct affecting a criminal prosecution
How it is analyzed

The reports themselves against body-worn and surveillance video, CAD records, and sworn statements, reconciled item by item to show where the paper and the record part ways.

Engagement terms and the published fee schedule: For Retaining Counsel →

“He engaged with the jury and his testimony was solid. I recommend Professor Gilbertson in any case involving police misconduct.”
Patrick Trudell, Attorney at Law · Kirkland, WA
Questions

Before the record is sent.

What does a report-reconciliation opinion produce?
A documented comparison: each material claim in the reports checked against video, dispatch records and statements, with the divergences identified and sourced.
What does retention cost?
A non-refundable $9,000 flat fee covering discovery review and the written expert report, with a bullet-point outline approved with counsel before writing begins. The full published schedule is on the For Counsel page.
Retain

Send the reports.

Attorney and law-firm inquiries only. Conflicts are checked before anything substantive, and you will hear about a conflict immediately.

Report integrity inquiry

For counsel with a false, altered, or omitted report matter.

Inquiry sent.

You will hear back directly. If the matter is urgent, call (239) 571-1840.

(239) 571-1840Direct line, Naples, Florida GregoryGilbertson@proton.meDirect email, prefilled for this matter.
Nationwide practiceRetained in 42 states and D.C. · Based in Naples, FL

Conflicts are checked before any substantive discussion. Please do not send privileged material with a first inquiry; after retention the record is exchanged on physical media. Gregory consults for attorneys and their staff only, and does not provide legal advice or attorney referrals to individuals.

Back to Police Misconduct