GILBERTSONInvestigations Inc. (239) 571-1840
Use of Force · Officer-Involved Shootings

Officer-Involved
Shootings

$42M
Plaintiff settlements & judgmentsSecured by retaining counsel in matters since 2014 · See the case file

Direct line: (239) 571-1840  ·  GregoryGilbertson@proton.me

Attorney and law-firm inquiries only

A police shooting is decided in seconds and litigated for years. The analysis traces those seconds through the record: what the officer knew, the threat as it actually presented, and whether deadly force was consistent with national standards and the agency's own policy and training.

From the Bench
U.S. District Court Western District of Washington

Never excluded. Professor Gilbertson’s testimony has not been excluded at trial in any state or federal court.

Ruling on a motion to exclude his testimony in Alvarez v. King County, No. C16-0721RAJ, 2017 WL 3189025 (W.D. Wash. July 27, 2017), Judge Richard A. Jones entered the following opinion.

“Mr. Gilbertson’s qualifications demonstrate extensive experience in policing. His expansive work as a police officer in Georgia, with assignments as a SWAT team officer, juvenile court investigator, school resource officer, stakeout squad officer, senior patrolman, and patrolman; then a career as a tenured college professor and university lecturer teaching criminal justice courses to degree-seeking students at colleges and universities, and as a licensed private investigator conducting felony pretrial investigations for attorneys in Washington State in dozens of criminal cases, makes him unique in the field of police expert witnesses. The Court finds that, based on his experience, Mr. Gilbertson’s testimony can be expected to have a reliable basis in knowledge and experience of police practices.”

The Hon. Richard A. Jones United States District Judge
The Scope

What this covers.

Within this engagement

  • Police shootings and deadly-force analysis
  • Wrongful-death cases involving police force
  • Shooting at or from moving vehicles
  • Immediate-threat assessment and severity-of-crime analysis
  • Objective reasonableness under Graham v. Connor
  • Use-of-force reporting and administrative review of the shooting
How it is analyzed

Body-worn and dash-camera video, 911 and CAD records, use-of-force reports, witness statements, the involved officer's training and disciplinary history, and agency deadly-force policy, reviewed frame by frame on the totality of the circumstances.

Engagement terms and the published fee schedule: For Retaining Counsel →

“His insights, analysis, reports, and trial testimony are always persuasive.”
James Bible, Attorney at Law · Seattle, WA
Questions

Before the record is sent.

What makes a police-shooting opinion hold up?
It is built strictly from the record: the video, the dispatch timeline, the reports and statements, and the officer's training, measured against Graham v. Connor and national deadly-force standards rather than hindsight. Where medical or ballistics questions arise, qualified experts in those disciplines are deferred to.
What does retention cost?
A non-refundable $9,000 flat fee covering discovery review and the written expert report, with a bullet-point outline approved with counsel before writing begins. The full published schedule is on the For Counsel page.
Retain

Send a shooting record.

Attorney and law-firm inquiries only. Conflicts are checked before anything substantive, and you will hear about a conflict immediately.

Officer-involved shooting inquiry

For counsel with a shooting matter, plaintiff or defense.

Inquiry sent.

You will hear back directly. If the matter is urgent, call (239) 571-1840.

(239) 571-1840Direct line, Naples, Florida GregoryGilbertson@proton.meDirect email, prefilled for this matter.
Nationwide practiceRetained in 42 states and D.C. · Based in Naples, FL

Conflicts are checked before any substantive discussion. Please do not send privileged material with a first inquiry; after retention the record is exchanged on physical media. Gregory consults for attorneys and their staff only, and does not provide legal advice or attorney referrals to individuals.

Back to Use of Force