GILBERTSONInvestigations Inc. (239) 571-1840
Use of Force · Chokeholds & Restraints

Chokeholds &
Restraints

$42M
Plaintiff settlements & judgmentsSecured by retaining counsel in matters since 2014 · See the case file

Direct line: (239) 571-1840  ·  GregoryGilbertson@proton.me

Attorney and law-firm inquiries only

Restraint force is where training and practice separate fastest: chokeholds, carotid and neck restraints, prone and positional restraint, and force applied to people already in handcuffs. The analysis measures what was done against what national standards and agency policy authorize.

From the Bench
U.S. District Court Western District of Washington

Never excluded. Professor Gilbertson’s testimony has not been excluded at trial in any state or federal court.

Ruling on a motion to exclude his testimony in Alvarez v. King County, No. C16-0721RAJ, 2017 WL 3189025 (W.D. Wash. July 27, 2017), Judge Richard A. Jones entered the following opinion.

“Mr. Gilbertson’s qualifications demonstrate extensive experience in policing. His expansive work as a police officer in Georgia, with assignments as a SWAT team officer, juvenile court investigator, school resource officer, stakeout squad officer, senior patrolman, and patrolman; then a career as a tenured college professor and university lecturer teaching criminal justice courses to degree-seeking students at colleges and universities, and as a licensed private investigator conducting felony pretrial investigations for attorneys in Washington State in dozens of criminal cases, makes him unique in the field of police expert witnesses. The Court finds that, based on his experience, Mr. Gilbertson’s testimony can be expected to have a reliable basis in knowledge and experience of police practices.”

The Hon. Richard A. Jones United States District Judge
The Scope

What this covers.

Within this engagement

  • Chokeholds and carotid or neck restraints
  • Prone and positional restraints
  • Hands-on physical force
  • Force against restrained or handcuffed people
  • Duty to render or request medical aid during restraint
  • Agency restraint policy and training analysis
How it is analyzed

Video of the restraint sequence, use-of-force and supplemental reports, medical records where counsel provides them, officer training files, and the agency's restraint policies, read against national standards and the duty to render aid.

Engagement terms and the published fee schedule: For Retaining Counsel →

From the Record

Related casework.

Case accounts as published by retaining counsel. No result is promised for any other matter.

Questions

Before the record is sent.

Was the restraint itself the excessive force?
That is the exact question the analysis answers: whether the restraint used, its duration, and the response to distress were consistent with national police standards, agency policy, and the officer's training, on the totality of the circumstances.
What does retention cost?
A non-refundable $9,000 flat fee covering discovery review and the written expert report, with a bullet-point outline approved with counsel before writing begins. The full published schedule is on the For Counsel page.
Retain

Send a restraint record.

Attorney and law-firm inquiries only. Conflicts are checked before anything substantive, and you will hear about a conflict immediately.

Chokehold & restraint inquiry

For counsel with a neck restraint or prone-restraint matter.

Inquiry sent.

You will hear back directly. If the matter is urgent, call (239) 571-1840.

(239) 571-1840Direct line, Naples, Florida GregoryGilbertson@proton.meDirect email, prefilled for this matter.
Nationwide practiceRetained in 42 states and D.C. · Based in Naples, FL

Conflicts are checked before any substantive discussion. Please do not send privileged material with a first inquiry; after retention the record is exchanged on physical media. Gregory consults for attorneys and their staff only, and does not provide legal advice or attorney referrals to individuals.

Back to Use of Force