GILBERTSONInvestigations Inc. (239) 571-1840
Use of Force · SWAT & High-Risk Operations

SWAT & High-Risk
Operations

$42M
Plaintiff settlements & judgmentsSecured by retaining counsel in matters since 2014 · See the case file

Direct line: (239) 571-1840  ·  GregoryGilbertson@proton.me

Attorney and law-firm inquiries only

A tactical operation is won or lost on the planning that preceded it. The analysis starts well before the door: the intelligence the team actually had, the threat assessment and risk matrix that justified a tactical response, the operational plan and briefing, and whether the force used during the entry matched what the plan and national standards contemplated.

From the Bench
U.S. District Court Western District of Washington

Never excluded. Professor Gilbertson’s testimony has not been excluded at trial in any state or federal court.

Ruling on a motion to exclude his testimony in Alvarez v. King County, No. C16-0721RAJ, 2017 WL 3189025 (W.D. Wash. July 27, 2017), Judge Richard A. Jones entered the following opinion.

“Mr. Gilbertson’s qualifications demonstrate extensive experience in policing. His expansive work as a police officer in Georgia, with assignments as a SWAT team officer, juvenile court investigator, school resource officer, stakeout squad officer, senior patrolman, and patrolman; then a career as a tenured college professor and university lecturer teaching criminal justice courses to degree-seeking students at colleges and universities, and as a licensed private investigator conducting felony pretrial investigations for attorneys in Washington State in dozens of criminal cases, makes him unique in the field of police expert witnesses. The Court finds that, based on his experience, Mr. Gilbertson’s testimony can be expected to have a reliable basis in knowledge and experience of police practices.”

The Hon. Richard A. Jones United States District Judge
The Scope

What this covers.

Within this engagement

  • SWAT and tactical-team deployment decisions
  • High-risk warrant service and operational planning
  • Threat assessment and risk-matrix justification
  • Operations briefings, assignments and contingency planning
  • Dynamic entry, containment and callout alternatives
  • Force applied during tactical operations
  • Command decisions and on-scene supervision of the operation
How it is analyzed

The operational plan and briefing materials, the threat assessment and any risk matrix, warrant paperwork and the intelligence it rested on, entry and body-worn video, after-action and use-of-force reports, team training records, and the agency's tactical policies, measured against generally accepted tactical standards on the totality of the circumstances.

Engagement terms and the published fee schedule: For Retaining Counsel →

“Professor Gilbertson has twice served as my expert in search and seizure and false arrest cases. His analysis and opinions are always spot on.”
Darryl Parker, Attorney at Law · Seattle, WA
Questions

Before the record is sent.

Is a SWAT case about the entry or the planning?
Usually the planning. By the time a team is at the door, the decisions that matter most, whether a tactical response was justified at all, what intelligence supported it, what alternatives to a dynamic entry were considered, and how the operation was supervised, have already been made and documented. That paper trail is where the analysis lives.
What does retention cost?
A non-refundable $9,000 flat fee covering discovery review and the written expert report, with a bullet-point outline approved with counsel before writing begins. The full published schedule is on the For Counsel page.
Retain

Send a tactical-operation record.

Attorney and law-firm inquiries only. Conflicts are checked before anything substantive, and you will hear about a conflict immediately.

SWAT & high-risk operation inquiry

For counsel with a tactical-operation or high-risk warrant matter.

Inquiry sent.

You will hear back directly. If the matter is urgent, call (239) 571-1840.

(239) 571-1840Direct line, Naples, Florida GregoryGilbertson@proton.meDirect email, prefilled for this matter.
Nationwide practiceRetained in 42 states and D.C. · Based in Naples, FL

Conflicts are checked before any substantive discussion. Please do not send privileged material with a first inquiry; after retention the record is exchanged on physical media. Gregory consults for attorneys and their staff only, and does not provide legal advice or attorney referrals to individuals.

Back to Use of Force