GILBERTSONInvestigations Inc. (239) 571-1840
Gilbertson Investigations Inc. · Washington Casework · Tacoma and Pierce County

Tacoma and Pierce County,
The Courthouse He Served

$42M
Plaintiff settlements & judgmentsSecured by retaining counsel in matters since 2014 · See the case file

Direct line: (239) 571-1840  ·  GregoryGilbertson@proton.me

Attorney and law-firm inquiries only

Use of force · Police practices · False arrest · State & Federal Courts

Professor Gilbertson has served the Pierce County Superior Court directly: two years as a Guardian ad Litem and Parenting Investigator for the court in Tacoma. As an expert, his Tacoma file holds civil rights claims against Pierce County, the City of Tacoma, Lakewood and Orting, in federal court and in the state courts.

From the Bench
U.S. District Court Western District of Washington

Ruling on a motion to exclude his testimony in Alvarez v. King County, No. C16-0721RAJ, 2017 WL 3189025 (W.D. Wash. July 27, 2017), Judge Richard A. Jones entered the following opinion.

“Mr. Gilbertson’s qualifications demonstrate extensive experience in policing. His expansive work as a police officer in Georgia, with assignments as a SWAT team officer, juvenile court investigator, school resource officer, stakeout squad officer, senior patrolman, and patrolman; then a career as a tenured college professor and university lecturer teaching criminal justice courses to degree-seeking students at colleges and universities, and as a licensed private investigator conducting felony pretrial investigations for attorneys in Washington State in dozens of criminal cases, makes him unique in the field of police expert witnesses. The Court finds that, based on his experience, Mr. Gilbertson’s testimony can be expected to have a reliable basis in knowledge and experience of police practices.”

The Hon. Richard A. Jones United States District Judge
Pierce County Superior Court

Two years investigating for the Pierce County Superior Court.

The practice file places 15 matters in Pierce County, 10 in federal court and five in the state courts. Four of them are published below with the outcome on the record.

Alongside those matters sits a different kind of tie to the county. Professor Gilbertson served two years as a Guardian ad Litem and Parenting Investigator for the Pierce County Superior Court in Tacoma. In that role he investigated for the court and filed detailed reports of his findings with its judges.

A Tacoma lawyer retaining him now is retaining someone who has already written findings for Pierce County judges: a report that says what was examined, what it showed, and where each conclusion came from. The rest of that history is in the biography.

On the Record

The published Pierce County selection.

15Pierce County matters in the practice file
10Federal court matters
5State court matters
$13.8MRecorded recoveries
Matter types in the Pierce County fileUse of force7Police practices4False arrest3Police misconduct3Wrongful death2Self-defense1A matter may carry more than one type.
Agencies named in the citationsPierce County6City of Tacoma3Lakewood3Orting1Counted from the citations as filed. A criminal citation usually names the state and the court rather than an agency, and a civil citation may name more than one.
  • Monet Carter-Mixon, Estate of Manuel Ellis and Marcia Carter v. City of Tacoma, Christopher Burbank, Mathew Collins, Masyih Ford, Timothy Rankine, Pierce County, et al., Case No 3:2021-cv-05692, Excessive Force.

    2021Federal courtUse of forceWrongful death$10.0M recovered
  • Joyce v. Pierce County, No. 3:2019-cv-06119, W.D. WA., filed Nov. 22, 2019, 42. U.S.C. 1983 Excessive Use of Force.

    2019Federal courtUse of force$3.5M recovered
  • Pickens v. City of Orting, No. 3:15CV05529, W.D. Wash. Nov. 10, 2016, Wrongful Termination, 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

    2016Federal courtPolice practices$250,000 recovered
  • Young Choi v. City of Lakewood, David Butts, and Brian Luttrull, Cause No. 3:21-cv-5119, Excessive Force & Civil Rights Violations.

    Federal courtUse of forcePolice misconduct$75,000 recovered
About this selection. The Pierce County matters above are a selection: civil engagements that produced a recovery for the client, and criminal engagements that ended in the defense’s favor. They are not the complete Pierce County record, and they are not offered as a success rate. Figures are the amounts recorded in each engagement, and citations are reproduced as filed; no result is promised or implied for any other matter. A matter is counted here when its own citation names the place. The state-wide file is on the Washington page, the nationwide selection is on the case history page, and the complete table of cases is provided to retaining counsel on request.
The Western District

Pierce County claims in the Western District of Washington.

The federal side of the Tacoma file is civil rights litigation, most of it cited to the Western District of Washington, and its claims name the county, the City of Tacoma, Lakewood and Orting. They run from excessive force and wrongful death to false arrest and police misconduct, and an employment claim under Section 1983 sits among them.

A claim of that kind is decided on paper and video the agency generated itself. The analysis reads the body-worn and dash camera footage, the dispatch record that fixed what the officers had been told, the use of force and incident reports, the internal review that followed, and the training and discipline files of each officer, and it measures the conduct against the agency's written policy and against generally accepted police practice. For force, Graham v. Connor sets the vantage point: the moment the force was used, without hindsight. That method is set out in full on the page for excessive force casework, and the arrest questions on the page for false arrest and search casework.

County and city

County and city agencies, each on its own policy.

The Pierce County captions name the county itself alongside city governments, and the distinction matters in discovery. Each agency writes its own policy and trains its own officers, so the question is always what this agency required of this officer on that date, read beside the national body of standards behind generally accepted practice. Medical and scientific questions are left to qualified experts in those disciplines, on the record. Legal conclusions remain counsel's; the expert addresses police practices.

The rest of the state's record, published results included, is on the Washington casework page.

The Engagement

Retaining from Tacoma.

Retaining from Tacoma runs exactly as retaining from anywhere else, and the Washington page sets out the engagement in full. In short: it opens with a conflict check, a first inquiry holds the case type and posture, the court and case number, the deadlines and the parties, and nothing privileged travels with it.

After retention the record travels on physical media by mail or courier, depositions are taken by Zoom or a similar platform, and trial testimony runs on the published travel terms. The fee schedule is on the For Counsel page, and the Library note on what to send with a first inquiry covers the first step.

Questions

Counsel ask about Pierce County.

What did Professor Gilbertson do for the Pierce County Superior Court?
He served two years as a Guardian ad Litem and Parenting Investigator for the court in Tacoma. In that role he investigated for the court and filed detailed reports of his findings with its judges, built on records that included police reports and on interviews with the people involved.
Has he worked cases against Pierce County and the City of Tacoma?
Yes, and against Lakewood and Orting as well. Each matter in the Tacoma file is counted under each of those four agencies its caption names, so the agency strip on this page shows how often each one appears. Where an outcome is on the record it is listed beneath, citation as filed; the rest are in the full case table, which retaining counsel receive on request.
Does the Tacoma file include state court matters?
Yes. Alongside the federal claims it holds matters in the state courts, including cases in Pierce County Superior Court, and the panel counts the federal and the state court matters separately. A state court matter is read from the same record as a federal one: the video, the reports, the statements and the agency's own policy and training.
Retain

Discuss a Tacoma matter.

Attorney and law-firm inquiries only. Conflicts are checked before anything substantive, and you will hear about a conflict immediately.

Counsel inquiry

Describe the Tacoma or Pierce County matter here, giving the court, case number, posture and next deadline, and name the parties; leave anything privileged out.

Inquiry sent.

You will hear back directly. If the matter is urgent, call (239) 571-1840.

(239) 571-1840Direct line, Naples, Florida GregoryGilbertson@proton.meDirect email, prefilled for this matter.
Nationwide practiceRetained in 42 states and D.C. · Based in Naples, FL

Conflicts are checked before any substantive discussion. Please do not send privileged material with a first inquiry; after retention the record is exchanged on physical media. Gregory consults for attorneys and their staff only, and does not provide legal advice or attorney referrals to individuals.